Letter from W. E. Henley, St. George's Lodge, to H. Beerbohm Tree, after 1901 May 3 : autograph manuscript signed with initials.

Expressing his frustration with Tree's production of "Macaire;" discussing, in detail and at length, his specific complaints about how his farce was presented and how the characters were portrayed; saying "It may very well be that, as you say, the Strand performance of "Macaire" was not 'a very lively entertainment'! What is certain is, that at least one journal - perhaps it was "The Times" - preferred Titheradge's performance, in print, before yours. As to the time (& your asking for 'cuts!), I think you'll find your effort at Her Majesty's the longest on record. The thing's self-evident. T & Co. were playing this play with a decent apprehension of what was asked of them : they brought in no snuff-box, stole no spoons, broke no china, nor played at being so many [illegible], where they had to deal with the very froth of wit their authors had given to their lips. I think that they were very much briefer than you & yours. I am positively assured that they felt so and that, you know, is all. But why compare? Tastes differ, dear Tree, & opinions. A great admirer of yours describes the effect of "Macaire" at Her Majesty's as that of a 'hurdle-race on wooden-legs.' Another asserts (in print) that you are supreme in everything but as Macaire you are 'colossal.' Believe me, there is room in "Macaire" for pretty much anything...And now let me thank you, very cordially, for your treatment of the "Beau" I am told that it was always acceptable, & in places delightful : that, in fact, you were better as George Frederick than you'd ever been. 'Tis much : & I would I had been there to see. I am pleased to learn that for you the result is a "distinguished success, both as author & as manager." As far as "Beau Austin" goes - yes : I accept your thanks. But as for "Macaire" - please, no! Please don't thank me! Thank, rather the old play, & your own genius..."